@Angela Yes, you are spending WAY too much. Please contact us so we can review your options.
]]>Whole life for a 30 year old from New York Life or Northwestern has many uses and should be a part of every young persons portfolio. While it does not make sense to cover their entire life insurance need with whole life, it certainly makes sense for a young person
This one of the most reckless statements involving life insurance that I’ve heard and I can only assume you’re an insurance agent that pushes whole life insurance on unsuspecting individuals. Every young person that I’ve encountered that has been sold whole life insurance 1. Does not have enough term life coverage to begin with and 2. Is not saving nearly enough in their Roth IRA’s or 401k’s.
Why? Because they’re sinking every last dollar they have into their overpriced whole life policy.
I’m 35 years old and there has never been an instance where a whole life policy made sense for me and my family. I have a $2.5m term policy that will take care of my family until I’m 64 and will be self-insured by the time the policy expires. This is the same strategy that I advise to all my clients.
I think you like the commission check that comes with indexed products instead of logical and concise customer-oriented advice.
Hmmm….I could say the same to you for pushing whole life insurance over term. To this day, we’ve had only a handful of clients (<5) that have bought indexed insurance and that's because that's what they wanted. 99.95% of our clients buy term life.
What does not make sense is recommending anything indexed and how you have made it as a financial planner having no intellect regarding life insurance.
The only insurance product that I recommend over anything over is term. I present indexed as an option. I’ve made 10 years as a planner because I present my clients with options and let them decide what’s best for them while never pushing propriety products.
Can you say the same in your less than 3 years experience?
http://www.brightscope.com/financial-planning/advisor/868324/Andrew-Beasley/
]]>Plus, thirty years of cash growth would be substantial, even in poorly performing policies. Not to mention the death benefit would be considerably larger if they chose paid up additions. So, if it makes sense budget-wise why would you not recommend having permanent coverage in addition to temporary? What does not make sense is recommending anything indexed and how you have made it as a financial planner having no intellect regarding life insurance.
I think you like the commission check that comes with indexed products instead of logical and concise customer-oriented advice.
]]>